"Police throughout the United States have been caught fabricating, planting, and manipulating evidence to obtain convictions where cases would otherwise be very weak. Some authorities regard police perjury as so rampant that it can be considered a "subcultural norm rather than an individual aberration" of police officers."
Dale Carpenter - Flagrant Conduct: The Story Of Lawrence v. Texas

WEBSITE IS IN DEVELOPMENT

Insert Ad 728 x 90

CONGRATULATIONS TO THE FIRST, TENTH & THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUITS
THEIR BRADY LISTS ARE NOW AVAILABLE FOR PUBLIC REVIEW






Review Our National Brady List
By Individual States



BRADYCOPS.ORG
  OUR HOME PAGE

________________________________
Florida's Brady Cop Lists
Scroll Down To Review

1th Judicial Circuit
2014 Public Record Request

BRADY LIST NOW AVAILABLE


2th Judicial Circuit
2014 Public Record Request
2ND REQUEST FOR PUBLIC RECORDS
3RD REQUEST FOR PUBLIC RECORDS
PER EMAIL - DOES NOT MAINTAIN A BRADY LIST


3rd Judicial Circuit
2014 Public Record Request
2ND REQUEST FOR PUBLIC RECORDS
3RD REQUEST FOR PUBLIC RECORDS
Brady List NOT Yet Available


4th Judicial Circuit
2014 Public Record Request

PER EMAIL - DOES NOT MAINTAIN A BRADY LIST


5th Judicial Circuit
2014 Public Record Request
2ND REQUEST FOR PUBLIC RECORDS

PER EMAIL - DOES NOT MAINTAIN A BRADY LIST


6th Judicial Circuit
2014 Public Record Request

PER LETTER - DOES NOT MAINTAIN A BRADY LIST


7th Judicial Circuit
2014 Public Record Request
2ND REQUEST FOR PUBLIC RECORDS

PER EMAIL - DOES NOT MAINTAIN A BRADY LIST
See Attached Media Article - Allegations That Agency Has Failed To Make Timely Brady Disclosures


8th Judicial Circuit
2014 Public Record Request

PER EMAIL - DOES NOT MAINTAIN A BRADY LIST


9th Judicial Circuit
2014 Public Record Request
2ND REQUEST FOR PUBLIC RECORDS

PER EMAIL - DOES NOT MAINTAIN A BRADY LIST


10th Judicial Circuit
2014 Public Record Request
2ND REQUEST FOR PUBLIC RECORDS

BRADY LIST NOW AVAILABLE
LARGE DETAILED FILE
Allow Time To Download


11th Judicial Circuit
2014 Public Record Request

THEIR BRADY LIST APPEARS TO BE MORE OF A LIST OF OFFICERS UNDER ACTIVE INVESTIGATIONS


12th Judicial Circuit
2014 Public Record Request

PER EMAIL - DOES NOT MAINTAIN A BRADY LIST
However, the prosecutor did provide a redacted court document which he alleges verifies his compliance with the Brady / Giglio mandates. Prosecutor was encouraged to develop a Brady list - Citizens have a right to know who are their Brady cops.


13th Judicial Circuit
2014 Public Record Request
2ND REQUEST FOR PUBLIC RECORDS

BRADY LIST NOW AVAILABLE


14th Judicial Circuit
2014 Public Record Request
2ND REQUEST FOR PUBLIC RECORDS

PER EMAIL - DOES NOT MAINTAIN A BRADY LIST


15th Judicial Circuit
2014 Public Record Request

PER LETTER - DOES NOT MAINTAIN A BRADY LIST


16th Judicial Circuit
2014 Public Record Request

PER EMAIL - DOES NOT MAINTAIN A BRADY LIST


17th Judicial Circuit
2014 Public Record Request

Brady List - 2014


18th Judicial Circuit
2014 Public Record Request
2ND REQUEST FOR PUBLIC RECORDS

PER EMAIL - DOES NOT MAINTAIN A BRADY LIST


19th Judicial Circuit
2014 Public Record Request
2ND REQUEST FOR PUBLIC RECORDS

PER EMAIL - DOES NOT MAINTAIN A BRADY LIST


20th Judicial Circuit
2014 Public Record Request

PER EMAIL - DOES NOT MAINTAIN A BRADY LIST



=========================


Contact Information For
All 20 Florida State Attorneys





WHAT IS A BRADY COP LIST?
Scroll Down To Review

In 1963, the United States Supreme Court made a landmark decision in Brady v. Maryland 373 U.S. 83. The decision's main focus was regarding exculpatory evidence in criminal prosecutions. Exculpatory evidence is evidence that tends to be favorable to the criminal defendant. In the Brady decision, the Supreme Court opined that the criminal prosecutor has an obligation to make a Brady disclosure where exculpatory evidence exist. Brady disclosures are mandated if statements of witnesses or physical evidence conflicts with the prosecution's witnesses, and when evidence exist that could allow the defense to impeach the credibility of a prosecution witness. Sometimes, it is the police officer that has a history of dishonesty, which will mandate a Brady disclosure. These police officers with credibility problems are referred to as “Brady cops”. Due to the Brady ruling, prosecutors are required to notify criminal defendants, and their attorneys, whenever a law enforcement officer involved in their case has a sustained record for knowingly lying in an official capacity. Because of this mandated responsibility, of identifying “Brady cops” - many local prosecutors develop a list of Brady cops that they make available to defense attorneys, thus satisfying that section of the Brady ruling. The prosecutors that do develop a Brady list will usually reach out to their local police agencies' internal affairs sections requesting sustained internal affairs investigations that call into question the credibility of those identified police officers. Surprisingly, many prosecutors do NOT develop or maintain a Brady list within their jurisdiction. In failing to do so, it's left to speculation on how these prosecutors fulfill their reporting obligations under the Brady ruling. Therefore, BradyCops.Org has a two prong purpose. We intend to build a nationwide database which contains as many of these Brady lists as we can secure. Further, we (BradyCops.Org) will identify those prosecutorial jurisdictions that have NOT developed or maintained a Brady list.










RESERVED
An Excellent Video Regarding
What Are Brady / Giglio Cops



Media Article
Click To Review



Insert Ad 728 x 90